Where's the option to shut off planet trading. Trading and buying techs, but giving up your soveirnty for money isn't. Shut off the planet trading option.

Look, no offense, but are you aware of the edit button?

I have to agree i would hate a system of that kind as well. One of the reasons i find Endless Space so off putting is the fact that there is no large surface of space and you can't go where ever you want but instead you are locked into systems with routs in between. 

Now I get it. A play on a misspelling of puny (as in small, insignificant, etc.) into punny (sp) (as in constantly making puns).

Your not alone, trust me, that is what Gal Civ I-III will be all about hopefully, We got some interesting surprises in store along with some multiplayer community and whatever the likes.

Guys, once again space pollution is definitely a good idea if you want space to change overtime... Have some asteroids, space junk and plasma storms around the solar systems and you got a good lively environment.

I tried to get all the quotes under one edit earlier. I couldn't make it work I will try again. It would be easier if I could just delete some of my quotes. If it take me days to read a site then there is no way I can remember all the posts.

A helpful hint: if you use the quote button, it will always put the selected text in a quote starting where your cursor is in the reply box. If you want to quote multiple posts in the same reply, you can quote and reply to one, then add a blank line or two below that text. When you quote the next one, it will appear as a separate paragraph below what you just typed. That allows you to easily highlight it and copy/paste if you want to rearrange the order the replies are in.

If the replies you want to quote are on separate pages, open a second window on your browser. Use the reply box on one, then use the second window to reply to the other posts. Copy and paste from one window into the other to get all your replies into one post. This method works even if the posts you are quoting are all on the same page, of course, but since it isn't quite as streamlined it's often easier to use the first method when you can.

I completely agree with the OP and those that mentioned Distant Worlds as an example where this was done well. 

One of the problems in Distant Worlds is that the AI is not capable enough to take advantage of those events (nor does the AI explore well enough) e.g. the AI finds super lasers but hardly uses them as ship construction size research is not given sufficient priority and also the AI builds far too many small ships etc.

However, if the GalCiv 3 AI is what we hope it will be ... there is a lot of potential here to add to the gameplay experience.

I will try replying instead of quoting thank you.

It wouldn't take much effort to make any environment to come to life, just insert idea, add animations or a background that changes with every turn. it will look more lively then if it was just the same damn thing all the time.

If the developers wanted to take this idea further, what about asteroid fields that move 1 tile every turn in a straight line or possibly random spawning plasma storms that block out all sensors for a short period of time.

Since this thread is so hot I will beam down a link that may or may not work

https://forums.galciv3.com/449787/page/1/

I know you may not agree with all ideas in here, I think it would be wise to help me out on this idea for Galactic civilization to have an adequate environment for all of us.

they don't, but that does not mean there can not be options for those that do.  Many RP things are flavor, which you can either ignore, or use.  Campaigns for example.  there are tons of ways you could add More RP flavor, on top of the base line game for those that want..  if not turn the stuff off in options and play a sandbox game..

Take crusader kings, that game is a major strat game, but has tons of RP flavor as well..  seeing GC II was single player, i would think GC III is as well..

GC3 has already been announced as having multiplayer. Scroll to the top of this thread and click "Game" then "GalCiv III Features". Under the heading "Multiplayer" you will find:

"

Multiplayer

For the first time, players can compete against each other in person and over the Internet in Galactic Civilizations III."

I can see pros and cons to this.  Having an interesting element to the Empires could be interesting but the main concern is how it is done.

If there were more every turn and it was the same as "choose a perk good vs neutral vs evil" every turn then no.  Especially as the "choices" are repeatable then it could just be a layer of boring on top of the existing game.  

While on the same side having the options of some automation or possible things that do need to be managed to keep the empire under control or there are consequences would be nice to have.  Such as the option that your actions can lead to the "Fundamentalist" revolt.

But I did find it bad when you have a 100% approval at your capital but it would just randomly flip to a revolt without any pre-ordained or bad actions that caused it when the Fundamentalist revolt happens.  I would like to have the slightly random element as it can add to the interest of the game.  Overall though this would require a careful balancing act to give it justice while also preventing the game from feeling like an endless grind..

I thought that distant worlds was to automated. One thing I would like to not see in galactic civilizations that is in distant worlds is tech research that you can't decide on. I wouldn't mind sharing tech research with the private sector, but not the private sector doing all the research.

Michael, you can choose to automate Distant Worlds research.  The AI isn't strong so there are huge benefits to manual control. 

Both games could learn from each other.

If Galactic Civilizations 3 applied a living galaxy similar to what Distant Worlds has, while Distant Worlds applied an AI similar to what Galactic Civilizations has, both games would be improved immensely.